You have already written the research. Every post you published was a test, and your readers voted on all of them. Archive Audit reads that record back to you and hands you the products it points to.
Enter your publication. Walk away with five product ideas that sit where your expertise, your readers' own words, and an open gap in the market all line up.
START HERE
Run my auditEnter your publication on the next screen. It counts your archive first, so you know whether there is enough to read before anything runs.
THE PROBLEM
So you pick the idea that feels right on the day you finally have time. You clear six weeks for it. You build it convinced this is the one.
It goes out to a list that likes you fine and never asked for that particular thing. It converts at one percent. You blame the subject line, or the price, or the week you launched. It was never the launch.
The real cost isn't the six weeks. It's the ask. Every list only puts up with so many misses before people stop opening what you send, and a guess spends that trust the same as a good idea would.
The evidence was already in your archive: which posts your readers argued with, which ones filled the comments with questions, the one subject you can't stop coming back to. You can't see it because, honestly, you remember what you meant to say, not what actually landed.
A miss costs you a quarter, and some of the trust it took to get that list. Reading the archive first costs you an afternoon.
HOW IT WORKS · THE ARCHIVE METHOD
01
One URL. No connecting accounts, no CSV exports, no tagging your own posts. The audit counts your archive, shows you what it found, and waits for you to confirm it is yours.
02
Your recurring expertise is mapped, your reader comments are read as demand, and both are laid over what your category already sells. Three layers, one picture.
03
Five product ideas, each with the reader evidence behind it, the position it can hold, the offer it implies, and hooks to test. Ranked, so you know where to start.
WHAT'S INSIDE
The audit is not a list of topics. It is a decision document. You should be able to read it once and know what you are building next month.
Five ranked product concepts
Each with a working title, the format that suits it, and who specifically it is for. Ordered strongest first, so you know where to start.
The reader evidence behind each one
The comments your readers actually left, quoted and verified against the source, plus a demand read on volume, intensity, unmet need and language match.
Your expertise map
The themes you own in your readers' minds, ordered by how consistently you return to them.
Competitive position for each concept
What already exists, what it charges, the claims that are table stakes, and the angle still unclaimed.
An offer sketch and a price anchor
What the thing includes, what to charge, and what it is anchored against in your category.
Hooks to test, and a survey email
Three hooks per concept, plus a ready-to-send email that asks your list which one they want without telling them you are asking.
You have a public archive with real comment activity on it.
You want to sell something to your list and you keep changing your mind about what.
You have a course or an offer that stalled and you suspect you built the wrong one.
You consult or coach, you publish to stay visible, and you have never mined it properly.
You are on post twelve. There is not enough record yet, and I would rather tell you that now.
Your archive is behind a paywall. The audit reads what a logged-out visitor reads.
You want somebody to build and launch the product for you. This tells you what to build.
You are looking for a guarantee of revenue. Evidence improves your odds; it does not remove the work.
WHY I BUILT IT
I have written to the same list for years, most Tuesdays. Before I build anything, I go back through what I have published and look for the pieces that did more than I expected them to, then check whether the subject is one I can actually teach at depth and whether anybody else has built it properly.
Every product I have sold has come out of that pass. The books, the offers, all of it. It takes me a day, and the reason it works is not talent. It is that the evidence was already there and I bothered to read it.
I have also closed a business with $100K in debt attached to my name, so I have a specific feeling about betting a quarter of your year on a hunch. That is the part I wanted to take off the table for other writers.
So I built the pass into a tool. Same three layers, no day of your life.
PRICING
Enter your publication, walk away with product ideas you can act on. No subscription, no upsell path, no call to book.
Not yet. Early-access runs are free while the audit is being validated against real archives, and there is nothing to enter a card into. $47 is what it will cost when it opens properly.
QUESTIONS
The audit needs at least 20 public posts before it can tell a recurring theme from a coincidence. Below that there is not enough record, and I would rather say so than hand you a report built on noise. You will find out in seconds: the next screen counts your archive before anything runs.
It takes a couple of minutes and it tells you up front if your archive is too thin to read.
Run my audit